Source decisions / October 16, 2026
A focused collection.
A clear purpose.
The portfolio features the strongest supported work and explains the need each resource addresses. Original files remain unchanged.
Download the source registerWhat belongs where
New attachments, archive contents and four additional saved sources informed the website update. Clinical draft status does not establish institutional approval or readiness for sale.
| Source | Review status | Website use | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| D01 01-Professional_Portfolio_Presentations_PowerPoint_Collection.zip | 13 deck entries; 12 byte-distinct | Source container | Select by project and review status, not archive size. |
| D02 02-IV-Therapy-Quick-Reference.pdf | Clinical/source review required | Visual-design case description | Verify device-specific instructions, care intervals and local standards before operational publication. |
| D03 RN_Clinician_Educator_Quality_Audit_Work_Report(1).docx | Retrospective work-product report | Quality case and work library | Distinguish the report from the individual packs/workbook it describes; do not infer measured outcomes. |
| D04 IMG_3249.jpeg | Source work sample | Optional source evidence | Use native source content for the featured presentation; keep the photo in an evidence drawer. |
| D05 05-Badge-Card-Design-6.png | Clinical review required | Design case description only | Review infiltration/extravasation distinctions and agent-specific actions before distributing the algorithm. |
| D06 06-Badge-Card-Design-2.jpeg | Clinical review required | Design case description only | Review clinical actions and EHR steps. This file is byte-identical to the second Design 2 attachment. |
| D07 07-Badge-Card-Design-5.png | Clinical review required | Design case description only | Different image revision of the flowchart; distinguish from a separately validated product. |
| D08 08-Badge-Card-Design-2.jpeg | Exact duplicate of D06 | Duplicate alias | Retain as source alias; do not count as a second work product. |
| D09 09-433F887B-1247-4C3A-9FA6-B9890D459127.jpeg | Identity and provenance unverified | Not selected | Do not present as a photograph of Angela, her students or actual staff without verified context. |
| P01 Acute_Condition_Electrolyte_Quiz.pptx | Clinical education draft | Teaching-design case | Validate clinical statements and local EHR workflow before release. |
| P02 CIWA_Education_Presentation edit final.pptx | Clinical education draft | Teaching-design case | Reconcile incomplete scoring ranges and verify medication/hold instructions against the active approved order set. |
| P03 ELECTROLYTE TRAINING AND EPIC SMART.pptx | Clinical education draft | Teaching-design case | Validate clinical statements and local EHR workflow before release. |
| P04 Pain_Compliance_Pitch_Deck copy.pptx | Quantitative claims need source data | Pain education topic context only | Retrieve original counts, denominators and calculation methods before publishing percentages or causal improvement claims. |
| P05 _CIWA_Ar_Nursing_Education_Portfolio.pptx | Clinical education draft | Teaching-design case | Validate clinical statements and local EHR workflow before release. |
| P06 HLC Audit and analysis.pptx | Incomplete draft with private learner data | Not selected | Remove unrelated Contoso, farming, sample financials, sample contact and template slides. Verify learner calculations and recertification assumptions; keep individuals restricted. |
| P07 Med-Surg_Unit_Improvement_Plan_Training(1) copy.pptx | Two revisions of one proposal | Teamwork case | Reconcile revisions and separate proposed timelines from completed implementation. Do not publish restricted workflow examples. |
| P08 Med-Surg_Unit_Improvement_Plan_Training(1).pptx | Two revisions of one proposal | Teamwork case | Reconcile revisions and separate proposed timelines from completed implementation. Do not publish restricted workflow examples. |
| P09 Nursing_Guide_Training_Presentation.pptx | Clinical education draft | Teaching-design case | Validate clinical statements and local EHR workflow before release. |
| P10 Preceptor_Facilitator_Guide(1).pptx | Exact duplicate source | Preceptor coaching case | One canonical guide. Its duplicate has the same SHA-256. Native SmartArt text provides the source structure. |
| P11 Preceptor_Facilitator_Guide.pptx | Source guide reviewed | Preceptor coaching case | One canonical guide. Its duplicate has the same SHA-256. Native SmartArt text provides the source structure. |
| P12 RN_Orientation_Learning_Guide (1).pptx | Learner-response material and draft imagery | Learning-needs case | Summarize the method without individual responses. Exclude garbled illustrative captions from featured assets. |
| P13 RN_Orientation_Training copy.pptx | Clinical draft with placeholder footers | Teaching-design case | Remove Sample Footer Text, validate linked policies and source claims, then complete clinical review. |
| L01 Angie Portfolio(2).docx | Retrospective compilation with repeated draft narrative | Background only | Descriptions are not independent proof of outcome or validation. |
| L02 Angela_Brown_NPD_Resume_Updated_2026-09-10.docx | Current saved resume reviewed | Professional background | Use broad clinical-teaching and behavioral-health experience; avoid treating a resume as independent employment verification. |
| L03 Patient and caregiver guide for tube feeding.docx | Specific-regimen draft | Patient/family education design case | Do not distribute a patient-specific regimen as universal guidance. Clinical and device-specific review required. |
| L04 Clinical_AI_Resource_Hub_Pitch_Deck_Final 7.pptx | 12-slide proposal | Collaborative AI case and hub preview | Same core proposal as previously reviewed version. Do not count versions as separate deployments. |
Presentation choices
The work-library cover graphics are newly designed summaries adapted from the reviewed sources. They are not represented as historical slides. Source notes identify the original work and distinguish the contribution, proposal and review status.
Original physical preceptor guide record
The physical teaching guide is retained in the private source archive.
Clinical reference review
The IV visuals and quick reference need clinical and local source review before they are released as operational references. In particular, the draft pathway must distinguish infiltration from extravasation and use the appropriate agent-specific guidance. As one relevant comparison, Cancer Institute NSW’s eviQ extravasation guidance for anti-cancer therapies and contrast media describes retaining the access device initially and planning drug-specific management. That scope should not be generalized into a universal algorithm for all IV problems.
Official comparison source: eviQ extravasation management ↗
The website demonstrates the design approach without republishing the unreviewed action pathways. The proprietary Hester-Davis scoring scale and employer-specific materials are not offered as independent products.
Search scope
The review combined the new local attachments, the previously reviewed portfolio collection and targeted searches of saved portfolio, clinical-teaching, caregiver, wellness and AI resources. Four additional saved files were read. This is a relevant-source review, not an assertion that every file in the account was exhaustively inspected. Unrelated family, employment-case and personal records were excluded from the professional website.